Indiana Mom of Seven Allegedly Offered Her Infant Daughter for Assault on Snapchat in Shock Case
It’s difficult to process the idea of a Snapchat message leading to an FBI raid, but that’s exactly what happened in Indianapolis in July 2025. The headline was shocking: “Indiana mom of seven accused of offering her 7-month-old daughter for illegal acts on Snapchat in exchange for $400.” It’s a story that weighs heavily on the heart.
Thirty-two-year-old Morgan Stapp, a mother of seven, came under scrutiny when authorities reported that Snapchat flagged a disturbing message she allegedly sent in November. The message was deeply troubling and reportedly included an offer involving her infant daughter, accompanied by photos of the child.
Within ten days of the message being flagged, FBI agents and local police arrived at Stapp’s Indianapolis home on July 8. Their investigation uncovered thousands of additional messages—over 7,000 sent in just a few days between October 29 and November 1, 2024—including some where Stapp allegedly offered personal content to afford essentials like baby diapers. These findings painted a troubling picture.
In interviews, Stapp denied sending the messages, claiming her account was hacked and that she lost access after upgrading her phone. However, court documents reportedly showed that the Snapchat account was accessed from the IP address inside her home, and photos sent after the alleged phone upgrade contradicted her claims.
This led to charges of attempted offenses involving a minor (a level 2 felony in Indiana), which carries a potential sentence of 10–30 years in prison. Stapp was arrested with a $100,000 bond and has a court hearing scheduled for September 15.
How does a parent reach such a point? This case raises difficult questions about mental health, financial desperation, and systemic challenges. Reports suggest Stapp may have been facing severe economic hardship, as some messages hinted at sharing personal photos to afford basic necessities. Yet, no level of hardship can justify the alleged actions.
When the FBI arrived, they found seven children in the home, underscoring the many lives affected by this case. Investigators acted swiftly after Snapchat’s alert. Social media platforms are increasingly vigilant about reporting potentially criminal content, and Snapchat’s quick response led to action within days.
The case highlights a troubling intersection of technology and desperation. The messages were sent through Snapchat, a platform many use casually, showing how everyday tools can be misused in devastating ways.
Stapp now faces serious charges, with a potential sentence of 10–30 years if convicted. She remains in custody until her September 15 hearing. Her children are under protective services, though details about their well-being are private.
This story is heartbreaking. It shows how desperation can lead to unthinkable choices and highlights the role of social platforms in identifying and reporting potential crimes. Snapchat’s alert to federal law enforcement reflects a growing responsibility for digital platforms to prioritize user safety.
Unlike sensational headlines, this case is rooted in tragedy and accountability. It touches on issues like child welfare, family struggles, and economic hardship—challenges that feel all too relevant today. We can’t ignore the broader implications.
As the case progresses through September, the focus remains on the 7-month-old child at the heart of the story. The legal system is designed to protect the vulnerable, and the charges reflect the severity of the allegations.
At its core, this is a story of collapse—financial, emotional, and moral. What grounds it is the rapid response from Snapchat and the justice system, turning a family’s crisis into a national wake-up call.
There’s a small glimmer of hope in this difficult situation: early intervention may have prevented further harm. Snapchat’s vigilance and the FBI’s swift action likely protected a child. It’s a reminder that systems designed to detect and respond to potential dangers are critical.
A family is in crisis, and society is watching closely. One message can unravel a household, but a platform’s quick action can help stop tragedy in its tracks.
