Raid underway at Democrat Rep. Ajay Pittman’s home and Capitol office in unfolding campaign fund misuse investigation
Authorities in Oklahoma have launched a sweeping investigation into Democratic State Representative Ajay Pittman, whose home and Capitol office were raided this week as part of a criminal probe into alleged campaign fund embezzlement. Pittman, who represents Oklahoma City’s 99th District, is accused of funneling more than $100,000 in campaign contributions toward personal expenses, including travel, shopping, and ATM withdrawals. The raids mark a dramatic escalation in what began as an ethics investigation and has now grown into a full-scale criminal inquiry.

The search warrants were executed on October 28, 2025, by investigators from the Oklahoma Attorney General’s office. Sources familiar with the operation confirmed that agents seized financial records, digital devices, and campaign materials tied to Pittman’s ongoing ethics case. Witnesses at the State Capitol said Pittman’s office door, located in Room 544, was sealed off with a “Please use other door” sign, as law enforcement restricted access to the area.
The case first surfaced earlier this year when the Oklahoma Ethics Commission filed a complaint accusing Pittman of misreporting campaign contributions and withdrawing thousands of dollars in cash for personal use. Investigators allege that Pittman fabricated a letter claiming that her campaign records were destroyed in a flood, a document later traced back to her own mother’s computer. According to court filings, the letter was created only minutes before it was submitted to the commission — an act prosecutors now consider evidence of deliberate falsification.

Pittman had already been fined and ordered to repay $35,000 to her campaign committee after acknowledging improper use of roughly $18,000 in funds in a 2024 settlement. However, as new evidence emerged of additional withdrawals and questionable reimbursements, the case was referred to state prosecutors for criminal review. The Attorney General’s office then moved quickly to secure warrants for both her home and Capitol office, citing probable cause for financial fraud and obstruction of an ethics investigation.
In response to the raids, House Speaker Kyle Hilbert stripped Pittman of her leadership role as chair of the State-Tribal Relations Committee. Several fellow lawmakers called for her suspension pending the outcome of the investigation, saying the charges undermine public confidence in the legislature. Pittman has denied any wrongdoing, claiming that “every expense can be explained” and insisting that she is cooperating fully with authorities.
The allegations paint a damaging picture for a legislator once viewed as a rising star in the Oklahoma Democratic Party. Pittman, first elected in 2018, has frequently positioned herself as a champion for education, healthcare, and tribal relations. Her political career, however, now hangs in the balance as investigators continue to review financial documents and personal transaction histories that allegedly reveal patterns of misuse.
Legal experts note that while campaign finance violations often result in fines or administrative penalties, the inclusion of falsified documents and the size of the alleged embezzlement could push this case into felony territory. If charged and convicted, Pittman could face prison time and be barred from holding public office.
The raid has also ignited fresh criticism from conservatives who argue that the Democratic Party has turned a blind eye to corruption within its own ranks. For many voters, the incident reinforces a growing demand for accountability among elected officials, regardless of political affiliation. As the investigation unfolds, Oklahoma’s political establishment is bracing for further revelations that could expose deeper issues of oversight and ethics in campaign financing.
For now, Rep. Ajay Pittman remains under investigation, with her office sealed and her political future uncertain. What began as an ethics violation has become a full-blown criminal case — one that underscores how quickly ambition can turn into scandal when public trust is violated.


